<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Renewable Energy Power Stations; renewable base load power grids; campaigns and technology &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/tag/news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog</link>
	<description>Pollution Reduction Climate Change Green Cause Campaign Donation Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Low emissions coal technology: news, views &amp; facts &#8211; New Gen Coal</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/low-emissions-coal-technology-news-views-facts-new-gen-coal</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/low-emissions-coal-technology-news-views-facts-new-gen-coal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Low Emissions Coal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[callide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstration projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Gen Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister kevin rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FutureGen Clean Coal Projects - DOE 2003 estimates for 2015-2016 commissioning of plants remain unchanged - Australian  Fact Sheet: DOE Plan to Demonstrate Multiple FutureGen Clean Coal Projects with Cutting-Edge Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technology. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Low emissions coal technology</h1>
<p>Storage technology still not proven and DOE 2003 estimates for 2015-2016 commissioning of plants remain unchanged &#8211; Australian  FutureGen Clean Coal Test Project uses refrigeration of CO2 Flue Gas Exhaust Streams for transportation a few hundred kilometres from host plant for underground injection &#8211; exhaust gas &#8220;oxy-fuels branded&#8221; derivation of the early DOE Plan to Demonstrate Multiple FutureGen Clean Coal Projects with Cutting-Edge Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technology.   <cite></cite></p>
<p><a title="ccup" href="http://climatecleanup.com"></a></p>
<div id="attachment_193" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 224px"><a title="low emissions coal technology" href="http://climatecleanup.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-193" title="ccup-v-logo-214-79" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ccup-v-logo-214-79.png" alt="low emissions coal technology" width="214" height="79" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">low emissions coal technology</p></div>
<p>CCUP is a humanitarian group engaged in projects for Climate Control, Clean Energy, and Eco-development based on proprietary Know-how.  CCUP’s “methods” are suitable for use by sovereign nations and individual entities to ensure long-term compliance with inter-governmental Global Warming commitments, are designed to enable long-term sustainable economic growth, and ensure the desired stability of the Earth’s atmosphere.</p>
<h2>Low emissions coal technology</h2>
<p>CCUP’s diversification is based on the core business’s CO2 Reduction capability that can be best described as “Carbon Conversion” technologies. In addition to reducing CO2 Emissions, these technologies can also produce clean fuels suitable for improving air quality in urban areas.</p>
<h3>Low emissions coal technology</h3>
<p>Carbon conversion enables the development of Feedstock-Flexible Energy-Plexes which produce “near-zero emissions electric power”, clean fuels, and chemicals, or combinations of these products.</p>
<p>CCUP’s carbon conversion technologies are the key enabling technologies for Energy-Plexes which are able to process numerous feedstocks like <strong>coal</strong>, biomass, natural gas, oil or waste materials with the production of <em>near-zero CO2 emissions</em>.</p>
<h4>Low emissions coal technology</h4>
<p>Clean energy products capable of being produced include synthetic gas [from which steam for the generation of near-zero CO2 emissions electric power is generated], <strong>CO2</strong>, hydrogen, methanol, diesel and gasoline.</p>
<h5>Low emissions coal technology</h5>
<p>Fact Sheet:  <cite>Source: <a title="low emissions coal technology" href="http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/futuregen/futuregen_revised_0108.pdf  ">http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/<strong>futuregen</strong>/<strong>futuregen</strong>_revised_0108</a><a title="low emissions coal technology" href="http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/futuregen/futuregen_revised_0108.pdf  ">.pdf </a></cite></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Low%20emissions%20coal%20technology%3A%20news%2C%20views%20%26%23038%3B%20facts%20%26%238211%3B%20New%20Gen%20Coal&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Flow-emissions-coal-technology-news-views-facts-new-gen-coal"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/low-emissions-coal-technology-news-views-facts-new-gen-coal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Expert on the CO2 Emissions Market</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydro Carbon Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Expert CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Climate Cleanup Group is the Number One positioned Green Technology group in the world:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>World Expert on the CO2 Emissions Market</strong></p>
<p>The Climate Cleanup Group is the Number One positioned Green Technology group in the field of CO2 Emissions Reduction in the world.  This means 80+% of all global web traffic looking for CO2 Emissions Reduction information visit one of our websites.  Below is a random sample of screen shots from our Web Services department:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="google_1_ccup_240209" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209" width="621" height="228" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-125" title="google_1_ccup_240209_2" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_2.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_2" width="499" height="339" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-126" title="google_1_ccup_240209_3" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_3.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_3" width="565" height="538" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-127" title="google_1_ccup_240209_4" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_4.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_4" width="553" height="329" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-128" title="google_1_ccup_240209_5" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_5.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_5" width="568" height="490" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-129" title="google_1_ccup_240209_6" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_6.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_6" width="539" height="219" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-130" title="google_1_ccup_240209_7" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_7.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_7" width="569" height="348" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-131" title="google_1_ccup_240209_8" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_8.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_8" width="547" height="223" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">Would you like much sought after web assets like these for your company’s products and services?</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">If so, please send our <a title="web services department" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/seo-web-services">Web Services department</a> an email enquiry by <a title="web services enquiry" href="mailto:enquiries@climatecleanup.com">clicking here</a> including your web site address and they will take a look and provide you with a quotation for Web Services.  They just love gunning for Number One on Google!<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">Thank you.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_82" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 122px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/seo-web-services"><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-82" title="seo-web-services" src="../wp-content/uploads/2009/02/seo-web-services.png" alt="SEO Web Services" width="112" height="60" /></strong></a></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">SEO Web Services</p>
</div>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=World%20Expert%20on%20the%20CO2%20Emissions%20Market&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Fworld-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Export of CO2 Emissions to China from UK</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/export-co2-emissions-china-uk</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/export-co2-emissions-china-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export of CO2 Emissions to China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
China&#8217;s growth is no figleaf for the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK

  
A worker rides past coal-fueled cooling towers at a power plant in Guangan Photograph: Frederic J Brown/AFP

Whenever a government or a corporation doesn&#8217;t want to do something, it blames China. You want fair terms of trade? Sorry, not when China&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="linktext">
<h3><span class="link-text">China&#8217;s growth is no figleaf for the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK</span></h3>
</div>
<div class="blog-image-caption"><a class="small mask" name="&amp;lid={trailItemImageAndTrailText}{Yellow Peril is distracting us from the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK}&amp;lpos={trail}{2}" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/feb/24/china-uk-c02-emissions-consumers"> <img class="image-in-trail" src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Environment/Pix/columnists/2009/2/24/1235475494928/china-emissions-001.jpg" alt="china emissions" width="460" height="276" /> </a></p>
<p class="caption">A worker rides past coal-fueled cooling towers at a power plant in Guangan Photograph: Frederic J Brown/AFP</p>
</div>
<p>Whenever a government or a corporation doesn&#8217;t want to do something, it blames China. You want fair terms of trade? Sorry, not when China&#8217;s dumping its goods on the world market. You want a 40-hour week? Forget it, the Chinese are working a 40-hour day.</p>
<p>Source: Guardian UK <a title="export of uk co2 emissions to china" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot</a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Export%20of%20CO2%20Emissions%20to%20China%20from%20UK&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Fexport-co2-emissions-china-uk"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/export-co2-emissions-china-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA To Regulate Power Station CO2 Emissions</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA to Regulate Power Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Regulations (USA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move would mean coal-fired power plants would be unlikely to receive the go-ahead without developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology [ or use our Black Box CO2 Emission Reduction Technology refer http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box ] . It could also open up heavy polluters to legal action by those who say they are affected by CO2 emissions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="clearfix">
<div class="articleTop">
<div class="articleTopPadding">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="articleTopLeft">
<h2>EPA will regulate greenhouse gases,<br />
says US climate chief</h2>
<h6>Regulator will rule that carbon dioxide is a danger to public health under Clean Air Act</h6>
<div class="articlebyline"><span class="datecolour">24 Feb 2009</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="articleLineHeight">
<div class="articleLinks">
<div class="content">
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px"><strong><a href="http://climatecleanup.com"><img title="Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations" src="http://climatecleanup.com/images/largest_power_polluters_180.jpg" alt="Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations" width="180" height="72" /></a></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations</p></div>
<p><strong>The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will regulate carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power stations, Barack Obama&#8217;s climate chief said this week.</strong></p>
<p>Carol Browner, special adviser to the president on <em>climate change</em>, said in an interview on Sunday at the Western Governors&#8217; Association meeting in Washington that the EPA is looking at a ruling from a Supreme Court in 2007 that requires the agency to decide whether CO2 emissions are a danger to public health and &#8221; will make an endangerment finding&#8221;. [ Refer to our 17th February Entry <a title="epa" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change</a> ]</p>
<p><strong>The decision will overrule a memo issued in the final days of the Bush administration that said that carbon dioxide emissions need not be considered when approving applications for new power plants.</strong></p>
<p>The move would mean coal-fired power plants would be unlikely to receive the go-ahead without developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology <em>[ or use our Black Box CO2 Emission Reduction Technology refer <a title="CO2 Emission Reduction Technology" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box </a>]</em> . <strong>It could also open up heavy polluters to legal action by those who say they are affected by CO2 emissions.</strong></p>
<p>When the review of the Supreme Court decision was announced last week, a permit application for a new coal-fired plant in Oklahoma was withdrawn within hours.</p>
<p>Many in the industry have argued that such a stringent change to policy should come through rules passed by Congress, rather than a decision by the regulator.</p>
<p>Browner also announced that the Obama administration is seeking to establish national rules for <strong>regulating emissions from cars</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8220;The hope across the administration is that we can have a unified national policy when it comes to cleaner vehicles,&#8221; Browner said.</p>
<p>But the <em>Washington Post</em> reports that rather than bypassing Congress on this policy, it is more likely that the Obama administration will seek to regulate it through a Congress-agreed cap-and-trade scheme, which would generate much-needed revenues for the federal government.</p>
<p>&#8220;The administration is engaged with Congress to pass cap-and-trade legislation, which the president believes is far superior to a regulatory approach using the existing Clean Air Act,&#8221; an official told the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p>
<p>&#8220;If [the EPA] finds that greenhouse gases endanger health or welfare, the next steps would be taken thoughtfully and with input from all stakeholders.&#8221;</p>
<p>The state of California is waiting to hear from the federal government whether or not it can regulate its own car emissions.</p>
<p>Source: <a title="usa to regulate power station co2 emissions" href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2237090/epa-regulate-greenhouse-gases">http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2237090/epa-regulate-greenhouse-gases</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=USA%20To%20Regulate%20Power%20Station%20CO2%20Emissions&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Fepa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road transport has biggest long-term impact on global warming says EU</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EEC Targets Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emissions from transport affect the climate both in the short and long term. New research explored the size and mix of emissions with short and long-lived effects and found that road transport has the largest effect on global mean temperature. The study conducted under the EU-funded QUANTIFY project compared the effects of current emissions from road, air, rail and shipping. The study explored the effects of emissions from a single year over different time periods and found that emissions from road transport have the most impact in the long term (20-100 years). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="background-color: #ffffff;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<div style="width: 90%; text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_56" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-56" title="europa-enivronment-logo" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/europa-enivronment-logo-300x51.jpg" alt="European Commission, Environment DG" width="300" height="51" /><p class="wp-caption-text">European Commission, Environment DG</p></div>
</div>
<div style="width: 90%; text-align: center;"><strong><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblTitulo" class="negritaGigante">Road transport has biggest long-term impact on global warming, says EU</span></strong></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<div style="width: 85%; text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: center;"><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource"><strong></strong></span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished"><br />
</span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource">European Commission, Environment DG</span> <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished"><br />
</span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished">Published Feb. 13, 2009</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><br class="salto_linea_peq" /> <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblDescription"></p>
<div style="text-align: left;">Emissions from transport affect the climate both in the short and long term. New research explored the size and mix of emissions with short and long-lived effects and found that road transport has the largest effect on global mean temperature. The study conducted under the EU-funded QUANTIFY project compared the effects of current emissions from road, air, rail and shipping. The study explored the effects of emissions from a single year over different time periods and found that emissions from road transport have the most impact in the long term (20-100 years).CO2 is the only GHG that remains in the atmosphere for centuries. It has an influence on warming over relatively long time scales compared to other greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as ozone. The researchers calculated that high levels of CO2 emitted as a result of fuel consumption means that road transport has the largest contribution to global temperature increases when 20 to 100 year timescales are considered. In contrast, aviation has a large impact over a 10 year timescale because most of its effects result from short-lived gases, such as ozone, and induced cirrus clouds. Shipping illustrates this variation in the effects of emissions; SO2 and NOx emissions from shipping cause an cooling effect during the first 40 years, but on longer timescales CO2 emissions from shipping cause a net warming effect. It should be noted that SO2 and NOx have other negative environmental impacts, such as causing acid rain.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p>The findings have important implications for policy as they demonstrate that the effectiveness of a GHG reduction strategy depends on its timescale. As an example, the authors give the EU&#8217;s target of limiting global warming to within 2°C above preindustrial levels. If this limit is to be reached within the next four decades, then a 40-year timescale is relevant. Over this timescale, the researchers calculate that the warming effect of aviation is 15 per cent of that caused by road transport. For shipping this figure is 4 per cent and for rail, just 2 per cent.</p>
<p>The research suggests that policies seeking to reduce the impact of current emissions in the longer term should focus on reducing emissions from road transport. However, if emissions need to be reduced in the short term, then policies should target aviation.</p>
<p>The study is based on estimates of global mean temperature and offers a simple tool that could help policymakers to assess the effects of future emissions scenarios on global temperatures. Previous studies have used an approach called &#8216;radiative forcing&#8217; (the difference between incoming and outgoing radiation), which the researchers suggest may be less easily applied in the context of making policy.</p>
<p><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource"><strong>Source and Article download:</strong> <a title="europa environment" href="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/140na1.pdf">European Commission, Environment DG</a></span></div>
<p></span></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 100%;" align="center"><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblKeywords"></p>
<table class="textoGrande" style="height: 56px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="468">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Road%20transport%20has%20biggest%20long-term%20impact%20on%20global%20warming%20says%20EU&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Froad-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Urged To Act On Climate Change</title>
		<link>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Regulations (USA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that -- contrary to the agency's claim -- EPA has the authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. The court also held that the agency could not refuse to use that authority based on the agency's policy preferences. Instead, the EPA would have to decide, based on the science, whether it believed that greenhouse gas emissions were posing dangers to public health or welfare. If the agency determined that endangerment was occurring, the agency would have to start the process of setting emission standards for greenhouse gases. In late 2007, EPA officials sent a proposed endangerment determination to the White House as an e-mail attachment, but White House officials refused to open the document, and former EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson refused repeated requests to make the document public.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">
<div id="attachment_50" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 289px"><img class="size-full wp-image-50" title="environmentalprotection" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/environmentalprotection.png" alt="EPA" width="279" height="89" /><p class="wp-caption-text">EPA</p></div>
<h2 id="ctl00_ctl00_cphBodyContent_cphContent_h2Article">News</h2>
<p><!--Title--></p>
<h3 id="ctl00_ctl00_cphBodyContent_cphContent_h3Title">18 States Urge EPA to Act on Global Warming</h3>
<p><!--Deck--> <!--Author, issue date--></p>
<p class="date">February 17, 2009</p>
<p><!--Article body-->On Feb. 5, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley lead an <em>18-state coalition</em>, the Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, and the City Solicitor of Baltimore, urging U.S. Environmental Protection Administrator Lisa Jackson to act in response to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in <em>Massachusetts v. EPA</em>.</p>
<p>&#8220;On April 2, 2007, the <strong>Supreme Court established the EPA&#8217;s responsibility to regulate greenhouse gases under the federal Clean Air Act</strong>. <strong>With the change in administrations, we are extremely hopeful that the EPA will finally start to do its job under the statute</strong>,&#8221; Coakley said. &#8220;The second anniversary of the Court&#8217;s ruling is now on the horizon, and we are today urging Administrator Jackson to issue as quickly as possible a determination that greenhouse gases are endangering public health and welfare.&#8221;</p>
<p>In <em>Massachusetts v. EPA</em>, the Supreme Court ruled that &#8212; contrary to the agency&#8217;s claim &#8212; <em>EPA has the authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act</em>. The court also held that the agency could not refuse to use that authority based on the agency&#8217;s policy preferences. Instead, the EPA would have to decide, based on the science, whether it believed that greenhouse gas emissions were posing dangers to public health or welfare. If the agency determined that endangerment was occurring,<strong> the agency would have to start the process of setting emission standards for greenhouse gases</strong>. In late 2007, EPA officials <strong>sent a proposed endangerment determination to the White House as an e-mail attachment, but White House officials refused to open the document</strong>, and former EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson refused repeated requests to make the document public.</p>
<p>The following states signed on to the letter: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. All of these states, together with the city of New York, and the Mayor and City Council for Baltimore, joined a petition last year seeking to compel EPA to act under the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling.</p>
<p>A copy of the letter can be found at <a title="18 states sign letter ro EPA" href="http://www.mass.gov/Cago/docs/press/2009_02_05_mass_epa_letter_attachment1.pdf ">http://www.mass.gov/Cago/docs/press/2009_02_05_mass_epa_letter_attachment1.pdf </a></p>
<p>Source: http://www.eponline.com/articles/70781</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Stations%3B%20renewable%20base%20load%20power%20grids%3B%20campaigns%20and%20technology&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=EPA%20Urged%20To%20Act%20On%20Climate%20Change&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.climatecleanup.net%2Fblog%2Fepa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change"><img src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
